GULF ISLANDS ALLIANCE
 


HOME

ABOUT US

JOIN US

PROGRAMS

ADVOCACY ADVICE

PUBLICATIONS and RESOURCES

NEWSROOM

     

Weak enforcement
erodes Trust mandate

The Islands Trust must strengthen its bylaw enforcement program to restore public respect for its ‘preserve and protect’ mandate Gulf Islands Alliance Chair Misty MacDuffee told Trust Council.

While she commended the Trust for some recent court victories in bylaw enforcement cases and for improved enforcement on some islands, she said “the feedback GIA is getting is that lack of enforcement is a major barrier to achieving the Trust’s mandate.”

GIA has learned that the Trust’s two enforcement officers are coping with approximately 150 cases. Alleged infractions include the illegal short term rentals of multi-suite homes and guest cottages, the sale of commercial products from residences, decks hanging over the foreshore and impeding beach access, the construction of buildings, additions and sea walls without permits or Trust approval, and various environmental abuses. Even when action is taken, some cases continue for months, even years.

“In some cases, strong bylaws are not enforced. In others, bylaws are difficult to enforce because of the way they are written. Violators are aware that prosecution is unlikely, so they proceed with impunity”, MacDuffee said.

MacDuffee’s presentation was made to the December, 2009, quarterly meeting of the 26-member Trust Council who regulate land use for the 13 Trust island areas.

GIA is also asking Trustees to implement recommendations made in its own Roycroft Report on bylaw enforcement, particularly to investigate weak language in existing bylaws and allocate funds for three full time bylaw enforcement officers. One officer is responsible for Salt Spring, Saturna, North and South Pender, Mayne and Galiano islands.

“One officer can’t possibly do an adequate job of responding to complaints over such a large area,” MacDuffee said. “No wonder islanders are frustrated.”

GIA also asked that revenues from successful legal actions be directed to the Trust’s legal budget to further supplement existing funds.

A recent letter to the Trust by Gisele Rudischer, a former Gabriola trustee and now a GIA board member, detailed some important insights into the enforcement issue:

“There is no point in writing new Official Community Plans and regulatory bylaws if they are not upheld.

“While going through the papers I accumulated over 12 years as a trustee and 6 years on the executive committee, I’ve come across numerous letters from residents of a number of islands pleading with the Islands Trust to enforce our bylaws.

“The credibility of the Islands Trust is at stake. To be taken seriously the Islands Trust must act when there are bylaw infractions. It is unacceptable that some cases go on for years with no resolution. On Gabriola, there is a steady stream of illegal dwellings being built under the guise of ‘studios’.

“The change in policy that allows bylaw enforcement based on advertisements of illegal activity, without a complaint, is not working. It seems there is no time, or stomach to enforce on complaints, let alone advertisements.

“Every week there are advertisements in the local papers for illegal rentals, yet there is no effort on the part of bylaw enforcement to control this problem. The attitude seems to be that if there are no complaints by neighbours, there is no action required. Complaints by residents who are not direct neighbours are characterized as nuisances.

“Other local governments deal with infractions more quickly and are taken more seriously” Rudischer concluded.



What can islanders do
to cope with climate change

This article was written by Dave Steen, following GIA's public gathering on Salt Spring Island on October 24, 2009, both as a personal summary/ retrospective on the gathering and for possible inclusion in a book by Trustee Jen Gobby. Her aim is "to profile and celebrate the climate action work happening on these islands; to bring together and promote the wealth of local knowledge and creative solutions to this global climate crisis."

The Gulf Islands Alliance (GIA) was founded in 2006 on the idea that people across the southern Gulf Islands have a better chance to achieve community and environmental goals by getting together to identify and help solve common problems.

That challenge in recent months has become a lot more daunting because of the growing threat of climate change.

If you’ve ventured to ask what you can do about climate change you may have concluded – especially in these downcast post-Copenhagen days – that it’s all futile and overwhelming. Maybe you see contradictions in government policies that, on one hand, encourage you to add insulation to your home and ride your bicycle and, on the other, encourage industry to increase sales of lumber and coal to China. Maybe the image of the massive tar sand scars on Alberta’s landscape appear to you when you’re urged to buy locally-grown food or attend meetings to help rewrite your local land use bylaws to make fractional reductions to your personal and community’s carbon footprint.

Such concerns are within GIA’s purpose which supports the visionary Islands Trust Act that aims to preserve the islands as a special beautiful and fragile environment. Concerned about the widespread misconception that the Gulf Islands must accept a proportionate share of overflow population growth like other local government areas near Vancouver and Victoria, GIA commissioned a legal opinion that shows the Act places island environmental preservation and protection ahead of development and other land use initiatives. This environment-first sentiment, shared by many islanders, largely explains why attempts to install municipalities on Salt Spring and Gabriola islands have failed.

Until climate change loomed as an external threat, islanders and their Local Trust Committees were seen to possess the capacity and courage to fulfill the promise of the Trust Act. In this positive process, GIA has been playing a watchdog role as a volunteer, grass roots group with members on all the islands. GIA also coordinates and strengthens the influence of islanders through its website, newsletters, brochures, press releases, deputations to Trust Council, and organizing public gatherings. Like the Trust Act, GIA’s prime goal is protecting the islands ecology.

The complexity of social and environmental management is apparent when it comes to interpreting and enforcing the Act. While it and its companion Policy Statement set out bold and necessary goals and directives, governance sometimes falls short because it tries to serve various environmental interests and opposing and better-financed development interests. And the province weakens the Trust’s authority by its failure to provide sufficient funding and other support, such as granting more local control over forestry.

The Trust’s soft underbelly, though, is its weak bylaw enforcement program. It stirs public disrespect for laws and lawmakers. By late 2009 the Trust employed only two bylaw officers, handling a whopping 150 cases. It refuses to take some violators to court because of the high cost and/or the fear that judges might accept bylaw language as it’s interpreted by defendants’ lawyers over how it would be understood by the average person. Many un-prosecuted violations, such as the illegal rental of guest cottages, mock community-approved and environment-driven population density allocations and limits. GIA is lobbying for full bylaw enforcement.

Now, added to this mix of manageable problems is out-of-control climate change. If its predicted impacts come true, rising sea levels, loss of biodiversity, and population dislocations will dwarf other threats to the islands environment. All our necessary local work will be like building sand castles on the beach as the tsunami approaches. So far, according to the United Nations, current international commitments to restrict carbon emissions will result in a 3 degree rise in average global temperatures, enough to shrink thousands of waterfront properties on the Gulf Islands, along with causing other kinds of mass chaos here and across the world.

But there’s a distance, even a disconnect, between this horrific threat and the world’s response, particularly Canada’s. In 2006 we stood alone among signatories to the Kyoto Protocol by officially abandoning our targets to cut greenhouse gases. We had promised to cut emissions by 6 percent between 1990 and 2012. Instead, we raised them 26 percent. Author George Monbiot says, “Canadians have almost the highest per capita emissions on earth, and the stripping of Alberta has scarcely begun.” In a small and telling move, the CBC bumped Copenhagen and climate change, but not Michael Jackson or Tiger Woods or Balloon Boy, off its list of the top nine news stories of 2009.

Despite compelling scientific evidence and ubiquitous images of the shrinking polar ice caps, some flat-earth people continue to deny climate change. Stories may have two sides, facts don’t. Some deniers are invested in carbon-pollution. Some don’t care or find it too inconvenient. Some argue it’s too disturbing, surreal, or just the wild imaginings of the 21st century brand of quirky doomsayers.

Fortunately, reality is marginalizing deniers, just as it did on a smaller scale in the tobacco smoking versus health battle a few years ago. Now, many believe the measures we’re taking to combat climate change aren’t enough. The magnitude of Islanders’ anxiety over climate change was evident in a one-day public ‘gathering’ on Salt Spring Island staged by GIA in the fall of 2009. The 137 attendees took part in small groups to discuss on-island proposals and programs to keep us sustainable and reduce our carbon footprint, and then heard different approaches from featured speakers – a rather sobering outlook by Neil Dawe of the Qualicum Institute and a more upbeat one from Guy Dauncey, author of The Climate Challenge, 101 Solutions to Global Warming.

Dawe said that life as we live it now is unsustainable. He cited economic and population growth as the root causes of ecological damage and climate change. Mankind’s excessive material demands outstrip the earth’s supplies, he said. “Any organism that disregards nature’s limits ultimately threatens its own existence,” he said. Explaining his pessimism, Dawe said that we’ve never had more environmentalists, more public interest in the environment, and more regulations than we do now. And we’ve never had more environmental degradation. “What we’re doing isn’t working.” Dawe says it’s an old and common mistake to balance, as equal players, environmental, economic and social needs. Without the environment, economic and social survival isn’t possible, he says. It’s also a mistake to believe that the economic and social systems that got us in this mess can get us out. It’s time for new and daring ideas. But Dawe’s solution, a ‘steady state’ economy, will be a hard sell, at least, until the deadly impact of climate change shows up in our own neighbourhoods.

Dauncey said the solution rests with reducing emissions and building a zero carbon world that is attractive and sustainable. He says the prospect of climate catastrophe can spark a peaceful, ecologically sustainable solar age and a world ‘powered and transported by 100 percent renewable energy, with green cities, zero waste, carbon-storing forestry, farming and ranching.’ “When we look at the world from this perspective, there are signs of hope and new life all over the place – and many come from small communities where people have a higher level of community trust and a greater willingness to embark on a new great adventure – places just like the Gulf Islands,” he said.

So, GIA is adding climate change to its list of more traditional environmental challenges for the islands. While we applaud the province and Islands Trust for demanding changes to local bylaws to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, no islander should be satisfied that these will be sufficient contributions to the solutions of climate change.

Much more is needed. Whether you’re more optimist or pessimist, localist or globalist or somewhere in between, GIA encourages you to be part of the solution. In this, GIA’s role is only as effective as the number and enthusiasm of its members and supporters and the wisdom and reach of its initiatives. We invite you to join us. The first step is to educate ourselves so we can independently assess the problem and consider the best solutions/actions. For instance, we must learn to be wary of over-hyped solutions, such as ‘cap and trade’ programs. This scheme, successful in reducing acid rain a few decades ago, involves placing a cap on each company’s carbon dioxide emissions. A company can either reduce its emissions or buy credits from another company that has gone below its cap. Critics suggest that we can’t buy our way out of this jam and that establishing ‘a giant international market in pollution’ is a delusional strategy, a corporate sleight of hand.

It’s also vital that we understand how little time we have. Nature isn’t waiting while mankind dithers over if and how to mitigate and cope with climate change. We’re on a track to calamity. How close do we have to get to it before we try to jump off? Some scientists say it’s already too late, our fate is sealed.

Climate change is a warning, a lecture, and a plea to treat nature better; it’s an end point of an abusive relationship. Nature made us what we are and we’re corrupting the very things it uses to nurture us. Do we value nature too much for how we can change her and too little for what she is unchanged? We justify the abuse in the name of progress, comfort and convenience. We freely use up nature’s resources to make more things than we need. We pay ourselves to produce and transfer goods. Now we’re learning that we’ve accumulated an environmental debt, one we ignore at our peril. It’s a hugely complicated issue, pointedly unsettling for our western democratic values, because it raises moral and political questions about private property privileges versus the common good, between individuals and between nations. The right to create wealth must be coupled with the responsibility not to impede any person’s best opportunity for legitimate fulfillment?

We must also appreciate the fact that each of us can and must act to make a positive difference. We may not be sure of the outcome; we can be sure of our resolve. The alternative – to leave it to others, who may do nothing, too – is unthinkable. Neil Dawe quotes Martin Luther King Jr: “There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but one must take it because one’s conscience tells one that it is right.” Dawe says our best hope to contain climate change is to first assemble enough people of conscience to form the critical mass required to move a community, a nation, a world. From that movement, enlightened, effective leaders will emerge. It hasn’t happened yet. The U.S. borrows heavily from its future generations to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but won’t finance a war against greenhouse gas emissions to save its future. On climate change, Canada’s policy is to hitch its star to the U.S.’ Paul Hawkin, in his book Blessed Unrest, writes: “If we try to calibrate American superiority by its treatment of the environment, the United States is one of the least intelligent civilizations in the history of the planet… Living within the biological constraints of the earth may be the most civilized activity a person can pursue, because it enables our successors to do the same.”

Copenhagen was a grandiose triumph of selfish national interest over the common world good. Ironically, its importance was lost in the bustle of Christmas shopping. This failure, though, can be seen as a perverse invitation to accelerate citizen action worldwide.

If you’re concerned about your island’s environmental sustainability, we would like to hear from you. GIA was formed after a recognition that we could achieve more by acting together than working independently on each of our islands.


Province must trust the Trust
to oversee private forest land

The Gulf Islands Alliance (GIA) is pushing to make sure a key initiative affecting land use on Galiano Island isn’t forgotten.

The non-profit grassroots group, along with the Residents and Owners Association of Galiano, have been pressing the province and Islands Trust to clear up the jurisdictional conflict between the Islands Trust Act and the Private Managed Forest Land Act (PMFL). The issue has been studied by Islands Trust for the past four years and needs to be resolved.

The effect of the conflict exposes Galiano to unregulated land use development and weakens the Trust’s mandate to preserve and protect the Gulf Islands.

“We wanted to have this settled by a provincial Order in Council,” said GIA’s chair Misty MacDuffee. “We have to make sure the good will and intent shown by the province and our trustees continues."

Following a GIA presentation at the Islands Trust Council meeting in March, many trustees favored a pilot project to try the proposed Order in Council. This would give the Trust more land-use control over Galiano’s private managed forest lands, an area which could amount to roughly 40 percent of the island. The issue was then taken to the province by the Trust’s executive committee.

Background to the issue:

The Gulf Islands Alliance is a three-year-old grassroots organization of islanders who support the Islands Trust in achieving its legislated object of preserving and protecting the Gulf Islands.

The Act includes a policy statement to protect “natural processes, habitats and species including those of the old forests, Coastal Douglas-fir forests, Coastal Western Hemlock, Garry Oak/Arbutus forests … [and plan] for the cumulative effects of existing and proposed development to avoid detrimental effects on watersheds, groundwater supplies and Trust Area species and habitats.”

But this enlightened mandate is undermined by competing legislation, the Private Managed Forest Land Act (specifically Section 21) that prohibits a local government, such as Islands Trust, from doing anything “that would have the effect of restricting, directly or indirectly, a forest management activity.”

Section 21 also provides ‘extra-territorial’ power, a fact that “creates layers of uncertainty for a Local Trust Committee attempting to perform their statutory duties even outside the boundaries of the PMFL lands,” MacDuffee said.

The issue becomes further complication by Galiano’s imminent Official Community Plan (OCP) review. Trevor Swann, chair of the PMFL Council, has said that critical portions of the PMFL Act are inoperative for Galiano because the current OCP was adopted before the PMFL Act. Many residents are concerned that the ‘grandfather’ advantage will be erased when the new OCP is adopted.

“It’s safe to say that without a clear and unequivocal resolution to the PMFL issue, a comprehensive OCP review cannot be carried out, as community resistance will be too great,” MacDuffee said.

The majority of island voters during the last three-year term of Islands Trust endorsed the position that no legislated resolution of the Galiano Forest Lands controversy was possible without an OCP review. The former local trustees unsuccessfully attempted to pass an OCP amendment and land use bylaw without a review.

GIA has met with senior government officials over the past few months urging them to implement a section of the PMFL Act that provides a mechanism to resolve this situation. It allows the Lieutenant Governor in Council to “make regulations exempting a person, place or thing, or class of persons, places or things, from a requirement of this Act.”

Because circumstances may be different on other Gulf Islands, this current initiative applies solely to Galiano.


GIA invites islanders
to help save Gulf Islands

MAY 8, 2008 PRESS RELEASE

The Gulf Islands won’t be protected from uncontrolled growth and development without more help from residents and other property owners, says the Gulf Islands Alliance. In its campaign to rally island citizens, the Alliance has delivered information/advocacy packages to 7,300 households in the Islands Trust area.

“Preserving and protecting our islands is not a radical notion,” says Alliance Chair Christine Torgrimson. “In fact it’s the guiding principle of our unique governance system, the Islands Trust. While we think that most islanders embrace this Trust mandate and become upset when certain land-use activities threaten their natural and social neighbourhoods, too many believe nothing can be done. Well, they – and we -- can do a lot. Our mail-out package explains how.

"For starters, it contains a simple guide to the Trust. It clears up many misunderstandings about what the Trust is and what it's supposed to do, and helps people engage more effectively in their local government. We particularly want people to understand how unique the Trust is and how fortunate we are to have it, as it is one of the very few conservation-mandated governments in the world.

“Our letter to island residents explains why our group was formed just over a year ago – we already have about 250 members across the 13 major islands – and it dispels many popular misconceptions that discourage people from doing what’s needed to protect their local and islands-wide community.”

Torgrimson explained that the Alliance is a grassroots, volunteer group that has no affiliation with the Islands Trust or other government or private agencies.

-30-

#1 Letter

Dear Friend of the Gulf Islands:

Just over a year ago a handful of people across the islands launched the Gulf Islands Alliance. The organization grew out of two recent inter-islands gatherings of over 100 people each on Denman and Salt Spring Islands. Delightedly, we’re learning just how much people love and yearn to maintain the island environment and rural communities. We want to appreciate and encourage the remarkable talent and wisdom of these people.

The Gulf Islands Alliance is also learning that many community challenges are similar across the islands. We share information and strategies to meet these challenges. Our mission supports the mandate of the Islands Trust to ‘preserve and protect the Trust Area and its unique amenities and environment.’ The Trust was formed in 1974 and specially structured to recognize and keep the Gulf Islands as a unique and fragile treasure among the most beautiful landscapes in the world.

Because the islands are near major and expanding urban populations and vulnerable to intolerable damage from unplanned growth, the Alliance constantly reminds island trustees and Trust staff of their vital role and responsibility to honour the conservation goals of the Islands Trust Act.

The Gulf Islands Alliance believes that many people across the political spectrum view themselves as stewards of this beautiful place and want to protect it from harm.

Problems such as water contamination, forest clear-cutting and poorly planned subdivisions are often easy to identify. It’s more difficult to show how little abuses, such as bylaw breaches, can gather momentum and lead to unwanted results. With thoughtful planning and management, the downsides of growth and change can be avoided. Here are some popular misconceptions that, if believed, discourage essential public participation:

Misconception: There are no threats to the Gulf Islands.

Reality: The Gulf Islands are too attractive for their own good. Without land use precepts that carefully shape and limit growth, the serenity that attracts people here will disappear.

Misconception: The Islands Trust is weak.

Reality: This myth diminishes respect for the Trust’s noble goals and good efforts. The Trust must work harder to explain its purpose and authority. Some complain when their land-use ambitions are foiled by the Trust’s preserve and protect obligation. Some even agitate for a conventional municipal government with greater allegiance to economic interests. The Alliance commissioned a legal opinion that tells trustees that they are trustees, more than politicians, and their actions must comply with the spirit and letter of the Trust Act. Although the Trust has been criticized for lax bylaw enforcement, closer examination reveals that enforcement often founders on poorly-written or poorly-interpreted bylaws.

Misconception: There are more deserving things that need our attention.

Reality: Promoting peace and good health in distant places doesn’t excuse us from serving our community. Having a peaceful island neighbourhood inspires us to be better world citizens.

Misconception: What happens next door is none of my business.

Reality: Official plans and bylaws express each community’s vision. They interpret and give force to the Trust Act. By insisting on sustainability and separating incompatible land uses, they are instruments of civility. Just as you have the right not to breathe polluted air, you have the right to quietly enjoy your home in the islands free from disruption.

Misconception: I can’t make a difference.

Reality: Mother Teresa said ‘we can do no great things ­ only small things, with great love.’ Telling others of your love for these islands is a small thing that will make a positive difference. You may have thoughts about how to help preserve and protect this very special place. People listen and act on good ideas, especially ones from caring, thoughtful people. Just as it’s sensible to maintain your car, the islands need your attention.

If you haven’t done so already, the Alliance invites you to become part of a growing community of people who are actively working to preserve and protect the Gulf Islands’ unique and wonderful environment and communities. We welcome you to join us and become a member of the Gulf Islands Alliance.

Christine Torgrimson
Chair, Gulf Islands Alliance (2006 to 2008)


#2 Guide

A Simple Guide to the Islands Trust

The Gulf Islands Alliance encourages islanders to know and participate in the visionary mandate of the Islands Trust. Facing pressures on the islands such as climate change and rapid growth, the Trust – a unique form of government designed to preserve and protect scenic and precious islands’ environment and communities – itself deserves preserving and protecting. We are fortunate to have one of the world’s few governments dedicated to conservation. Here’s a quick look at the Trust:

Area and inhabitants – The Trust encompasses 13 major islands and 450 smaller islands in the Strait of Georgia and Howe Sound in southwestern British Columbia. Home to 25,000 people, the Trust area attracts more than 1 million visitors annually and boasts an abundant biodiversity including many rare and endangered species.

History and Purpose – In the 1960s and ’70s, people who cared about the Gulf Islands became increasingly worried that poorly managed growth and development would one day overwhelm and ruin these islands. As a result, in 1974 the province created the Trust to safeguard ‘the Trust area and its unique amenities and environment for the benefit of the residents of the Trust area and of British Columbia generally.’ With a population growing at twice the provincial rate, the Trust continues to struggle to save the rural life and natural environment that attracts visitors and property buyers to the islands.

Structure – Every three years two trustees are elected in each of 12 island areas and in the Bowen Island Municipality, for a total of 26 trustees on the Islands Trust Council. Except for Bowen, where trustees are part of a municipal council, each pair and a chair person comprise a Local Trust Committee. Each chair is a trustee from another island area appointed by the Trust’s four-member executive committee.

Function – The Trust primarily plans and regulates land uses which must conform to the preserve and protect goals on the Islands Trust Act. Regional districts and other entities look after other local services such as roads, policing and fire protection.

Trust Council sets policies for the entire Trust area, directs staff, ensures bylaws and official community plans conform to the Trust Policy Statement, and interacts with provincial and federal agencies whose work affects the Trust area. Council meets at various locations four times a year, usually for three days.

Local Trust Committees hold public business meetings that often include Trust staff reports and land use regulations. These committees are guided by official community plans and bylaws that are reviewed for possible revisions about every five years. Changes are sent to the Trust executive committee for approval. The provincial Ministry of Community Services must also approve changes. Local trust committee meeting schedules are posted in island newspapers and on the Trust website and various community information networks and notice boards. Trustees also serve as community leaders who interact with other agencies.

Trust financing – More than 90 percent of the 2007-08 operating budget of $5.65 million is from local taxes. About $273 of property taxes or 10 to 14 percent of the total bill on a typical island residence assessed at $400,000 went to the Trust. An average property on Bowen Island contributed only $84 to the Trust because the municipality does its own planning. The Trust is also funded through user charges, including application fees and provincial grants. Since the Trust started, provincial funding has dwindled from almost 100 percent to 2 percent today. (Some say the province pays too little to protect a resource for all BC.)

Islands Trust Fund – In 1990 the Trust created a regional land trust to work with island communities. To date, the Trust Fund Board, through acquisitions and conservation covenants, has protected 69 special natural and cultural features, a total of 2,175 acres. Citizens can participate by making donations or contributing land or conservation covenants on their properties. For example, the Natural Area Protection Tax Exemption Program gives landowners on many islands a tax reduction on the portion of their property protected by a conservation covenant. See the Trust website for further information.

Get involved in Islands Trust

Elections - Having good trustees is one of the best ways to ensure that the islands are protected. If you don’t run yourself, you can still help by recruiting and electing candidates committed to the Trust mandate.

Committee and Council meetings - Comments by e-mails, letters, conversations with trustees and/or presentations at public meetings and hearings are welcomed on re-zoning and development-related applications and other land use matters brought to your Local Trust Committee. It can reject or amend any proposal before and/or during giving it three readings. Changes to official community plans or bylaws require an official public hearing. This process differs in the Bowen municipality. At quarterly Trust Council meetings, time is set aside for presentations and comments from the public. For more on how to have your voice heard, check the Trust website.

Official community plan reviews - Held every five years or so, trustees guide these reviews, inviting extensive citizen input. Typically, citizens can participate by applying to serve on committees, by expressing views in writing and/or speaking at small group sessions or community meetings.

Bylaw compliance - Enforcement generally is complaint-based. Islanders who witness a bylaw violation can contact the Trust and speak to a bylaw enforcement officer.

How to contact the Islands Trust

Trust Website: www.islandstrust.bc.ca gives the full story on Islands Trust, including how to contact your trustees. You can sign up for a subscription service to receive e-mails about the Trust.

Victoria Office:
(Serving Trust Council, overall Trust management, Islands Trust Fund, and the Galiano, Mayne, North Pender, South Pender, Saturna and Executive Islands Trust areas.)
Islands Trust
200 – 1627 Fort Street
Victoria, BC V8R 1 H8
250/405-5151

Salt Spring Office:
Islands Trust
1 - 500 Lower Ganges Rd.
Salt Spring Island BC V8K 2N8
250/537-9144

Gabriola Office:

(Serving the Denman, Gabriola, Gambier, Hornby, Lasqueti and Thetis Trust areas).
Islands Trust
700 North Road
Gabriola Island, BC V0R 1X3
250/247-2063

Bowen Island Municipality Office:
981 Artisan Lane Box 279,
Bowen Island, BC V0N 1G0
604/947-4255



Grassroots group
to help preserve and protect
Southern Gulf Islands

Press release, December 7, 2006

Victoria - A new group of concerned citizens from across the southern Gulf Islands has formed to support the 'preserve and protect' goals of the Islands Trust Act.  

Announcement of the Gulf Islands Alliance launch was made at a regular meeting of the Islands Trust Council today in Victoria. 

"We want to ensure the full implementation of the Islands Trust mandate to keep our fragile island ecosystems intact and our rural communities small and diverse," said Alliance Chair, Christine Torgrimson, of Salt Spring Island. 

"Our aim is to better inform ourselves and the public to support measures that counter the growing threats to our islands." 

"In the 1960s and 70s the province recognized the fragile and special nature of the islands. It wisely legislated the Islands Trust Act in 1974 to protect what it said was one of most unique and threatened environments in the world. 

"Since then, the Trust area population has more than doubled. The Trust has wrestled with the forces of industry, development and tourism to try to keep the islands intact. In recent years, the province has unfortunately refused to provide the resources and legislative tools that the Trust needs to do its job thoroughly." 

Noting recent national public opinion polls placing the environment as a leading public concern, Torgrimson said "residents of the islands and beyond are receptive and ready to join us and the Trust to make sure these precious islands are not squandered." 

She pointed out that in several recent public forums, sponsored both by the Trust and by citizen groups, people from various islands discovered they share similar concerns. 

"Throughout the islands, we are struggling with shortages of groundwater, illegal rental of residences for short-term vacationers, logging and tree-cutting issues, and the loss of near-shore marine life. Some islands are literally losing their residential communities as second homes and short-term vacation rentals take over their neighborhoods and housing prices escalate well beyond many islanders' means. 

"We have recognized that we can be far more effective by getting together as an inter-island force, learning from each other, finding the best solutions, and bolstering the efforts of the Trust," Torgrimson said. 

"Particularly because we live on islands, we realize that we must define and accept limits on population, tourism and use of island resources. We're not unrealistically against all growth and development, but we will actively oppose growth that diminishes the environment and/or abuses the public good at it's described in the Islands Trust Act." 

In recent years, various Gulf Islands have been hit hard by residential and commercial development, resource depletion and increasing tourism. These are the same issues that sparked passage of the Islands Trust Act 32 years ago. Since then provincial funding has declined to levels which now jeopardize Islands Trust ability to safeguard an ecologically rare archipelago that includes 13 major islands and more than 450 smaller islands.


Marine Conservation planners
seeking public comments

Marine 'mixers' have been held in various locations to explain and receive public input to the proposed National Marine Conservation Area Reserve in the southern Strait of Georgia. The 'vision' of what the region will look like in 25 years has been prepared by Parks Canada based on guidance from NMCA legislation and various interested groups. Several Gulf Islands Alliance members attended the Duncan mixer and raised concerns over the exclusion from the proposed protected area of the northwest area adjacent to Thetis and Valdez islands, waters now designated for shipping anchorages, along with the industrial and shoreline development around Ladysmith, Chemainus and Crofton. It was also learned that among other marine areas subject to further consideration are Fulford and Ganges. For all the details visit their website www.pc.gc.ca/straitofgeorgia


Some BC bird species threatened
by economic growth: ornithologists

At their Annual General Meeting in Lillooet on 26 May 2007, the BC Field Ornithologists (BCFO) adopted a position on the fundamental conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation. The BCFO addresses the study and enjoyment of wild birds in British Columbia through research and conservation efforts to preserve birds and their habitats.

The timing of the vote was opportune as Birdlife International announced the previous week that 22% of the planet's birds are now at increased risk of extinction. A total of 1,221 bird species are presently considered threatened with extinction and an additional 812 species are considered Near Threatened, an increase of 28 species from last year. In British Columbia, 43 avian taxa are considered extirpated, endangered, or threatened and a further 48 species are of special concern.

Dr. James Ginns, BCFO President, noted that "Our position statement is precedent setting in that the BCFO is one of the first conservation organizations in British Columbia to focus attention on the causes of biodiversity declines rather than simply focusing on the symptoms as most environmental organizations are doing today. Unless the causes of the problem are addressed, biodiversity declines are likely to continue."

One of the causes for these declines is economic growth. The economy grows by appropriating natural capital from the economy of nature (ecosystems) and using it for the human economy. As the human economy expands it removes resources, displaces healthy ecosystems, and degrades remaining ecosystems with waste.

Thus, economic growth reduces the quality and quantity of bird habitat when it's converted as throughput to the human economy. It's this growth that tends to swamp any gains made through conservation and policy efforts.

Similar positions on economic growth have been sanctioned by a number of professional scientific organizations in North America including The Society for Conservation Biology, The United States Society for Ecological Economics, The Wildlife Society, and The Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy.

The BCFO position explains not only the fundamental conflict between economic growth and biodiversity conservation, but identifies an alternative: the steady state economy.


Islands can be loved to death

The Best and Worst Islands : A Scorecard

(This story appeared first in the Seattle Post Intelligencer on November 17, 2007)

It's no secret that people love islands.

But sometimes, we can love them to death. When tourism overkill strikes, the end result is not such a nice place.

National Geographic Traveler and its National Geographic Center for Sustainable Destinations conducted the fourth annual Destination Scorecard survey, aided by George Washington University. A panel of 522 experts in sustainable tourism and destination stewardship donated time to review conditions in 111 selected islands and archipelagos. Whidbey Island wasn't in the mix, but Washington's San Juan Islands and British Columbia's Salt Spring Island were included in the survey.

Guide to the Scores

0-25: Catastrophic: all criteria very negative, outlook grim.

26-49: In serious trouble.

50-65: In moderate trouble: all criteria medium-negative or a mix of negatives and positives.

66-85: Minor difficulties.

86-95: Authentic, unspoiled, and likely to remain so.

96-100: Enhanced.

Judges' Comments

San Juan Islands, Washington State, Score: 70

"This pleasant archipelago retains its attraction due to limited access through a network of well-managed ferries. With a growing number of second homes and slight gentrification, the islands still retain a good balance between environment and infrastructure."

"No big hotels, no big crowds, but the open spaces are under attack by nonnative invasive plants. And whale watching in the waters off the islands is completely out of hand, with the native orca pods chased and harassed all day every day from May to October by tour boats."

"Varied experiences on the different islands. Good kayaking, whale watching, hiking, bicycling. However, islands could be more 'bike friendly' with dedicated bike lanes needed."

"Over 100 islands, each with its own character and attributes. Perhaps the worst is overdevelopment of Roche Harbor to appeal to rich baby boomers and the imposition of urban values into a beautiful setting. However, buildout settlements on other islands have remained sustainable and tasteful."

Salt Spring Island, Gulf Islands, British Columbia Score: 69

"Salt Spring Island offers tourism options, mainly centered on contemporary fine arts/music culture, creative organic cuisine, agritourism, and marine ecotourism, largely driven by strong-minded locals who scrutinize every new possibility with intense National Geographic criteria eyeglasses!"

"The population is becoming increasingly artsy, retired, wealthy second homes, etc. Skyrocketing housing prices."

"Suffering from being too popular. Major conflict between locals who want tourism and those who moved there to hide from humanity."

"As long as the Islands Trust exercises strong land-use policies, the potential exists for Salt Spring to remain as a delightful and memorable destination."


How and why we should promote
ecological health over economic growth

This comprehensive report by Neil K. Dawe, director of the Qualicum Institute, appeared in the spring of 2008 in Salt Spring Island Conservancy's newsletter, the Acorn.

For unnumbered centuries of human history the wilderness has given way. The priority of industry has become dogma. Are we as yet sufficiently enlightened to realize that we must now challenge that dogma, or do without our wilderness? -- Aldo Leopold

In March, 2005, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) was released. This report, based on the work of over 1,300 scientists, is the most comprehensive look at the state of the Earth's ecosystems ever completed. It reports some significant conclusions:

"Human activity is putting such strain on the natural functions of Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted.

The provision of food, fresh water, energy, and materials to a growing population has come at considerable cost to the complex systems of plants, animals, and biological processes that make the planet habitable."

After over a century of conservation efforts around the world, 60% of the 24 ecosystem services the MEA reviewed were either being degraded or used unsustainably; they noted that "Human activities have taken the planet to the edge of a massive wave of species extinctions, further threatening our own well-being."

The 2007 IUCN Red List for Threatened Species supports the MEA findings, noting that over 20% of the species in the groups where most of their species have been assessed (Gymnosperms, amphibians, birds, mammals) are now in danger of extinction. And only 3% of the world's 1.9 million described species have been assessed.

Other studies have shown similar results. The Global Ecological Footprint analysis to 2003 indicates that humanity exceeded the carrying capacity of the biosphere in the mid-1980s. The Living Planet Index, shows that we have eroded about 40% of our natural capital since 1970, a little over one human generation.

Now, consider this: today we have more wildlife professionals and environmental organizations and volunteers working on more ecological research, and environmental awareness, education, and stewardship programs than ever before; we have more rules and legislated regulations in place to protect biodiversity; more conservation and ecosystem restoration projects; and more protected areas than ever before. Despite all this effort, there is more environmental degradation than ever before. What conservationists are collectively doing is not working. And yet we keep doing it, environmental business as usual.

One of the main reasons we, at the Qualicum Institute (www.qualicuminstitute.ca) believe this has happened is quite simple: for the most part we've only been addressing the symptoms of the problem rather than the root cause. We spend our efforts, acquiring habitats, cleaning streams, dealing with endangered species through recovery plans and so on, but we fail to address the root cause of these environmental problems. If we continue in this vein there is little doubt we'll fail in virtually all of our conservation efforts.

So what is the root cause of these problems? A number of scientific and non-governmental organizations-including the Qualicum Institute-have concluded that it is economic growth. To understand this fully, one must have some appreciation of our conventional economic model and of economic growth itself.

Economic growth is an increase in the production and consumption of goods and services and is a function of increasing population and per capita production and consumption. Thus, it can also be considered an increase in throughput, or flow of natural resources, through the economy and back to the environment as waste.

This required throughput unavoidably results in the removal of structural ecosystem elements; the depletion of non-renewable resources; actual displacement of healthy ecosystems, their biodiversity and their life support services; and degradation of the remaining ecosystems with wastes. So, as the GDP continues to rise we know that somewhere, ecosystems are being degraded or displaced or both, along with their biodiversity and life-support services. Since everything humanity depends upon comes from global ecosystems, economic growth only occurs when natural capital from the economy of nature is appropriated for use by the human economy where it is converted to manufactured capital and consumer goods. Because of the tremendous breadth of the niche that we occupy, the human economy grows at the competitive exclusion of wildlife in the aggregate. This is fundamental to our understanding of the basis of our economy and biodiversity loss.

The conventional or neoclassical economic model, under which much of the global economy operates today, assumes that infinite economic growth on a finite planet is possible; the economy is considered to be the whole rather than a subset of the biosphere and is not governed by physical and ecological laws and principles such as thermodynamics and carrying capacity. The economy is seen as a perpetual motion machine that can run forever on its own output.

But the flow of economic throughput is not circular. It flows one-way from low entropy (useful) resources to high entropy (used-up-ness) waste, according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. To grow, the economy must take more and more useful matter and energy from the finite biosphere to produce goods and services; wastes are inevitable by-products. Ultimately, all our goods become wastes as well. The economy cannot function simply by using only its own labour, manufactured capital, and waste as input.

While mainstream economists may think we can ignore carrying capacity and the laws of thermodynamics, "Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored," as Huxley observed.

Biologist and ecological economist, Brian Czech, using an ecological analogy, identifies economic growth as a limiting factor to wildlife conservation. He shows that there is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecosystem health, including biodiversity and the ecosystem services on which we all depend.

As conservationists, we can no longer ignore the fact that an economic model based on infinite growth on a finite planet with finite resources-a model with no connectivity to the biosphere-is fatally flawed and is causing the loss of ecosystems, their biodiversity and the life support services upon which we all depend. Even many of our so-called "protected areas" are no longer providing secure habitats for the wildlife dependent on them as the effects of economic growth continue to impact them directly.

If economic growth is the limiting factor to biodiversity conservation, economic growth is what has to be addressed. Otherwise, everything else we do to try and conserve biodiversity will be for naught, as the economy continues to steamroll over more and more ecosystems further reducing biodiversity and the ecosystem services that support all life on the planet. That, appears to be what is happening.

There is a solution to this dilemma: we can choose to move towards a sustainable economy with a reasonably stabilized population and levels of consumption: an economy that ecological economist, Herman Daly, calls a "steady state economy." He summarizes the concept:

The main idea of a steady-state economy is to maintain constant stocks of wealth and people at levels that are sufficient for a long and good life. The throughput by which these stocks are maintained should be low rather than high, and always within the regenerative and absorptive capabilities of the ecosystem.

The scale of the steady state economy must be sufficiently below the ecological limits so that enough natural ecosystems and biodiversity remain to allow the maintenance of the planet's biodiversity which is integral to normal ecosystem functioning and the provision of the ecosystem services necessary for life.

So what can we do? Well first we have to choose to make the change from doing only the "sexy" tasks of dealing with the symptoms and start to include significant efforts to address the root cause. Once that choice is made, here are some other choices:

1. learn as much as you can about our current (neoclassical) macroeconomic model and its replacement model from ecological economics. You can do both by reading the excellent book Ecological Economics, by Herman Daly and Joshua Farley.

2. learn about the steady state economy. The Society for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE) web site has an excellent resource centre with papers that discuss a number of aspects of this topic: http://www.steadystate.org/CASSEResources.html

3. join the over 1,500 individuals who have signed on to the CASSE position statement on the fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecosystem health: http://www.steadystate.org/CASSEPositionOnEG.html

4. encourage all the environmental or social justice organizations you belong to, to adopt a position statement on the fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecosystem-and thus our own-health. Have them register their position with CASSE (to see position statements that other professional organizations and NGOs have adopted, go to: http://www.steadystate.org/CASSECompilationPositions.html) and publicize their decision.

5. talk to your local, provincial, and federal politicians/decision-makers about dealing with the fundamental conflict. Ask them, e.g., to explain how the economy-a human construct that is totally dependent on natural resources for its growth-can keep up its perennial economic growth when those resources are finite. Ask them to explain-if growth is so good-why the disparity between the rich and the poor keeps growing, why our taxes keep rising despite the growth, and why environmental quality worsens and biodiversity declines despite the fact that the GDP continues its astronomical rise.

6. talk about the fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecosystem health to the people you know who may be able to influence decision makers. 7. hold a dinner or dessert party and talk this topic up among friends and colleagues. Include the viewing and discussion of documentaries such as The end of suburbia or What a way to go.

8. work to have your community begin to prepare for the oncoming effects of peak oil, climate change, and biodiversity loss. What will these changes mean for your community if food no longer arrives from afar with regularity, if sea level rises a metre, if temperatures increase and precipitation decreases? What is the human carrying capacity of your region in terms of food and water, considering the experts views of the upcoming changes?

9. call into talk shows, write letters to the editor, and voice your opinion on the fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecosystem health. We need a critical mass of people to change from our fatally-flawed economy to a sustainable, steady state economy.

10. encourage invitations to the Qualicum Institute or others, such as conservation ecologists and ecological economists (e.g., Bill Rees), to speak on the fundamental conflict at conferences, chambers of commerce, etc. It is important to understand that Smart Growth concepts are good liveability concepts but they're not sustainability concepts and that technological optimists are not speakers to effectively address these issues. Common sense tells us that we have more technological progress than ever before in the history of civilization and yet at the same time, the ecosystems of the Earth are in the worse shape they've been in recorded history. We all need a good dose of reality.

Finally, while we may know all these facts, that is not enough; we also need to act. Recall the words of Robert F. Kennedy: "It is not enough to understand, or to see clearly. The future will be shaped … by those willing to commit their minds and their bodies to the task."


Let's put our political weight
behind ocean protection

By Howard Breen

The sun-sparkled emerald waters of the southern Gulf Islands are more than a natural attraction to lure tourists.

Our waters define us as a seaside paradise, an island archipelago with beachcombing, swimming, boating, fishing, diving and the increased property values that go with proximity to the ocean.

But those waters are in deep trouble, and it should be a concern to everyone, not just island environmentalists.

The situation, ignored for far too long in Victoria and Ottawa, has become so grave that numerous businesses and communities along the B.C. coast have come to see it as an issue of financial life and death.

Unless governments address the prospect of rising seas, worsening ocean pollution, shoreline development and deforestation and over fishing through inadequate coastal management policies, B.C.'s multi-billion dollar a year ocean tourism industries will suffer and struggle. To say nothing about the impact on the social and ecological viability of our treasured isles.

Numerous island-based ocean-related businesses -- from kayaking, sport-fishing and diving to whale watching charters -- depend on healthy water quality and habitats. It's time we do more to conserve the valuable resources upon which these activities dearly depend. Those that are privileged to profit from the sea need to help us better steward our human uses and activities.

Coastal pollution from sources such as upland and municipal septage, cruise lines, fish farms, and ocean dumping, outbreaks of red tide, dwindling fish catches, unsustainable shoreline development, and loss of eel grass habitat and other marine habitats demand urgent action -- from us all.

Inter-jurisdictional ocean protection gridlock and over-exploitation of our seas is dumb-wrong.

We can not permit yet another Earth Day or Ocean Day to pass as a glib agency public relations celebration. The washing of hands for the crisis that imperil the seas that surround us must immediately end. Industries and governments responsible for the crisis may acknowledge past failures, but now insist things have changed for the better. We know better. Polluters still get a free pass and too many who profit from our sea get a free ride.

Island Trustees speak often of their support for marine issues and have often been the first to propose to advance ocean stewardship and coastal research. But they can't, and shouldn't have to do it alone. Proof of Victoria and Ottawa's sincerity in collaborating with the Islands Trust and our island communities will come only when they take action. All talk and no action is unacceptable and indefensible.

As islanders we have a unique opportunity to lead the way in meeting challenges that faces our blue planet and our special corner of it.

The litany of dangers includes:

Unwise coastal development, pollution, coastal drilling, unsustainable fishing and aquaculture practices, global warming that threatens marine species and habitat, shorelines, and the woeful lack of a solid federal-provincial-regional-First Nation ocean management and regulatory framework.

The Gulf Island Alliance asks the Trust to use the power of its mandate and the Trust Object to press for solutions, such as:

Reducing aquatic and marine pollution, attacking global warning, and toughening clean water standards for numerous coastal industrial sectors.

Adopting an ecosystem-based management approach to upland deforestation and development to ensure the survival of downstream marine life and marine habitat.

Creating a network of coastal marine protected areas with meaningful prohibitions to address a myriad of threatening marine uses.

Setting up a unified, coordinated inter-governmental leadership and governance for ocean and coastal resources, beginning with a long overdue inter-governmental/ stakeholder marine planning process for the Salish Sea.

The Trust might also look into pushing for passage of a new Clean Ocean Act, new legislation to address increasing cruise ship tourism impacts, enabling legislation and funding for tank-only fish farming, and new ecosystem-based legislation and regulation which seeks to address problems from watershed to shorelines and adjacent waterways.

(Howard Breen was the first Environmental Chair of the Gulf Islands Alliance, is a resident of Gabriola Island and loves all things wet and wild.)

Pump it
don't dump it

By Howard Breen

In May 2007 federal Transport Minister Lawrence Cannon was expected to approve regulations for the prevention of pollution from ships.

They would legally authorize discharges of sewage sludge, blackwater and greywater effluent, incinerator ash, oily bilge and ballast waters from large commercial passenger vessels plying Canada's inshore waterways. They will even occur within marine protected areas such as our National Marine Conservation Areas.

Million of gallons of pulverized, sprayed-with-chlorine crap is not what Canadians want off their shores.

BC citizens are urged to let Minister Cannon know that his regulations will do little to prevent cruise ship pollution and that he and Environment Minister John Baird must act immediately to jointly announce an immediate prohibition on all cruise ship discharging in Canada's marine protected areas.

Please contact Cannon and Baird and ask them to take a stronger position on marine pollution from shipping. Let them know that Canadians treasure their three oceans and want the the Conservative government to honour its commitments to safeguard the environment.

They should be doing everything they can to end the abysmal cruise ship fleet practice of using Canadian waters as their en route toilet between two U.S. ports of call.

And if they can't achieve this goal with the current regulations -- which bundle yachts and fishing boats together with large commercial shipping vessels -- they should pledge to enact new national cruise ship legislation.

Canada should adopt a regime similar to Alaska's. It has the best statutory independent compliance monitoring (Ocean Ranger program), vessel disclosure, and enforcement in the world.

Canada's new regulation is too timid to end harmful sewage and other effluents and emissions from the international cruise fleet traveling along the labyrinthine coastline of B.C., through grey whale migratory routes, past approximately 650 salmon spawning rivers, and over 20 threatened and endangered marine species.

We insist that the cruise industry's free pollution pass be immediately revoked and that zero discharge become the new operating principle in new federal cruise tourism legislation.

Here's some background:

The Canadian Marine Advisory Council (CMAC), an industry dominated consultation group crafted with Transport Canada the Conservative government's new shipping pollution prevention regulations which will now legally authorize cruise ships to discharge sewage sludge and effluent, greywater, incinerator ash, crushed garbage, oily bilge effluent, and medical liquid wastes in Canadian waters.

There is no explicit regulatory exclusion for zero discharge within or near Canada's National Marine Conservation Areas, marine ecological reserves, and other marine protected areas, thus the integrity of the marine habitat and species of these areas are placed in undue harm by these new shipping regulations.

The new regulations are the marine effluent pollution equivalents of “intensity targets” that the Conservatives are proposing in its Green Plan for atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The cumulative discharge of a growing cruise fleet is not addressed.

Ocean pollution worldwide from cruise ships has fouled beaches and created a serious human health risk, contributed to lethal algae blooms, and the suffocation of sensitive ecosystems from hyper-nutrification. Where there is appropriate monitoring and enforcement in the U.S., the industry has among the highest felony fines ever imposed for recidivist environmental crimes.

Earlier in the spring of 2007 Cannon, in response to Senator Pat Carney and opposition critics in a Transport Canada parliamentary committee review, said stronger penalties and jail time awaited any cruise line that violated the new regulations. But the real statutory nature of these regulations undermines the Minister's claims. For instance:

-- Cruise Lines are not held to a 'zero discharge' precautionary operational principle, yet no other mode of public transit (rail, air, bus) is permitted to discharge human waste into its operating environment.

-- The industry will remain largely self-reporting. Transport Canada vessel inspections are in such a sorry state that no pollution charge, let alone felony conviction, has ever occurred in Canada despite the industry chalking up some of the largest pollution felony fines in U.S. history. Most noteworthy, there is no provision for 'in operation' inspections at sea, only what vessel owners want inspectors to see while the vessel is moored in port.

-- Cruise Lines are not expected to fit their vessels with holdings tanks large enough to permit their vessels to hold sewage sludge for shore side pump-out. Since most of the B.C. leg of the Alaska-bound route is less than twelve miles from shore, it is safe to presume that thousands of tons of sewage sludge will blanket the route each cruise season.

-- In exemptory practice, vessels with so-called advanced waste systems can discharge once outside port. These vessel owners claim to treat sewage adequately for discharge. Transport Canada provides no data whatsoever to Canadians to substantiate these claims, and Environment Canada provides no studies to reassure Canadians that vessel discharges do not cause harm to sensitive habitat and species at risk.

-- Provision for adequate disposal of certain contaminants, such as incinerator ash, seem to be absent from the regulations though vessels routinely burn medical, galley and other ship garbage, paint can residues, and other ship waste at sea.

-- Cruise ship issues, such ocean pollution, plans for Canadian taxpayers to help finance the construction of a federal cruise ship terminal and provision of a fleet-wide, fuel subsidy and possible emission exemption from the Kyoto Treaty are certain to become hot topics in the next federal election.

(Howard Breen is former Environment Committee Chair of the Gulf Islands Alliance)


Misty MacDuffee new GIA chair

Misty MacDuffee of Pender Island is the new chair of the Gulf Islands Alliance (GIA), replacing founding chair Christine Torgrimson of Salt Spring who was elected to Islands Trust in November.

Misty was elected at a December GIA board meeting on Galiano Island. She holds a bachelors degree in biology and environmental science and has been working on salmon conservation and management issues, advocating for fisheries reform for 10 years with both government and non government organizations.

Several years ago, Misty traveled around North America and abroad with a 4,000 pound cedar stump from Clayoquot Sound to raise global awareness about temperate rainforest destruction on Vancouver Island.

She was chair of the Raincoast Conservation Foundation from 1999 to 2007 and a board member of the Land Conservancy of BC.

If the Islands Trust was a ‘perfect’ institution, the Gulf Islands Alliance wouldn’t exist, she says. But, of course, it’s not. And Misty confesses to being a strong critic, once telling a CBC radio show that, “Since the Islands Trust was established in the 1970s with a mandate to ‘preserve and protect’ the Gulf Islands, the mandate has rarely been upheld.”

But she insists that for GIA to be credible and effective — to the public and Islands Trust — it must be fair, honest and positive in its criticisms and positions. And GIA takes seriously its duty to speak out freely, it has no ties to the Trust or any environmental organization, she says.

If GIA believes that any land or fore-shore across the islands is being rezoned and developed contrary to the Trust mandate, it will say so boldly, she says. “Two types of people are drawn to the Gulf Islands,” she says.

“There are those who see the islands as a beautiful, rare, fragile archipelago and feel privileged to live, travel or vacation here. They value the minimal infrastructure, rural-feel and emphasis on ecological integrity and heritage.

“The others look at these islands as a gold mine just waiting to be dug up. They buy land with the intention of development whether it’s needed or wanted. They work to change the zoning by-laws and official community plans.”

It’s ‘exhausting’ for residents to stay vigilant to the constant applications to rezone and amend, she says.

Misty was distressed last year when the decision to rezone 40 percent of Galiano was only narrowly defeated by the former Trust Council. Some trustees saw their role no differently from any other municipal politician, she says.

“But GIA applauds the trustees who voted to uphold the trust mandate.”

Christine Torgrimson welcomes her replacement.

“Misty will be a marvellous chair,” she said. “She has the experience, passion and ability to help carry GIA forward in effective and exciting new ways.

“I am proud of what GIA has built in two years. It’s a strong inter-islands organization with almost 300 members.

  “We have weighed in on many issues:  the Galiano forest-lands; the intent of the Trust object, with a legal opinion to support it; the need to resolve conflicts between the Private Managed Forest Land Act and the Islands Trust Act; an appeal for more public process when planning decisions affect a major portion of any island; support for improved Trust local planning services; licensing for hydro-fracturing of wells; prohibiting LNG tankers in Trust-area waters; no bridge to Gabriola; and releasing the Trust from any land-use planning restrictions imposed by the TILMA inter-provincial trade agreement.

  “We have great potential to grow into a powerful citizens’ voice for preserving and protecting the Trust area.”


back to the top of the page